MarioWiki:Featured articles/N/Mario Party 4

Mario Party 4

"Mario Party 4" was nominated for featured article status on June 20, 2026, 00:37 (UTC). If the nomination does not pass by August 19, 2026, 00:37 (UTC), it will be considered failed.

Current time: August 1, 2026, 15:57 (UTC)

Support

1. The Real Color Splash Fan (talk) I think the page is well written with lots of detailed information and good images.
2. SlavaMarioGamer (talk) Everything on the page is well explained.

Oppose

1. Power Flotzo (talk) Having looked the article over, there don't seem to be many problems; however, the first one I've noticed is that the ratings for this game are unsourced. While some of them can be gleaned from simply looking at the images for the box art, others might need a bit more elbow grease for verification. EDIT: According to Xiahou Ba on the forums, the intro and gameplay sections (as well as the commercial part) need images, the reception section can be expanded, and the multimedia section should talk about the soundtrack as opposed to listing the music tracks.
2. Yoshi18 (talk) I feel like this article should have a proper "pre-release and unused content" subarticle before we can even start discussing about it becoming featured.
3. Wandering Poplin (talk) Featured articles should represent the best pages this wiki has to offer. While the page is by no means bad or poorly written, I do not feel that it is one of the best pages hosted on this wiki. Both due to the missing info brought up by the above comments, as well as underdeveloped sections such as the "list of reused assets" section, or the promotion section.
4. The Dab Master (talk) Per all.
5. Camwoodstock (talk) This page is certainly fine, but we don't think it's particularly exemplary. The pre-release and unused content section in particular feels rather wanting.
6. Kazzy (talk) I've found various areas of the article quite clunky to read. The main issue I've found is sentences that are quite long with heavy comma usage. Whilst a lot of these are technically grammatically correct, they can actually make it more difficult to read. There are also instances of the same word/noun being used closely together (e.g. "Bowser mini-games are played when a player lands on a Bowser Space and has players competing to not be the loser of the mini-game; Bowser mini-games always have a losing player and have that player burnt by Bowser.") which also makes the article not read as smoothly as it should for it to be featured, in my opinion. I also agree with others regarding the promotion and unused content sections needing to be fleshed out. Finally, the Sales section needs sources for its figures.

Removal of opposes

Power Flotzo

1. The Real Color Splash Fan (talk) I sourced all of the ratings, so that shouldn't be a problem now.